9/11 was actually done by Godzilla
With the anniversary of the attack on the twin towers, I thought It might be fun to mock some of the conspiracy theories surrounding it. Now I'm not a scientist or mathmagician but I've got enough common sense in me to tell me what is logical and what is not. Now I know that will alienate many here because their brains have never considered this "logic" thing before. Without even getting into all the juicy bullshit theories my brain has a problem. Yours should too if you think logically. If not, you'll have to just humor me. Or not. I don't give a fuck.
Regarding the "false flag" aspect of this all I have one question: Why? Why would the US ever have to do something like this just to declare war so we could invade someone? Since when have we had to try hard to find a reason to war in the Middle East? Since never. Why would we undertake something like this JUST so we could have an excuse to go to war? We could have just DONE IT. We've done it before and will most likely do it again. So you're telling me that we would do all this just to accomplish what exactly? Something that we could have happen WITHOUT all this? It's not logical at all. Now lets explore what a lot of people are just fine with believing in. They think that our government rigged all three towers with explosives and then paid a bunch of Middle Eastern guys to "hijack" jets full of people in order to somehow cover up the detonations. Riiiiiiight. The square footage of all three towers is roughly 12 million square feet. Do you know how large that is? You could fit 250 football fields in that space. So you would need close to that in wiring for the "bombs." How long do you think THAT would take? How much do you think it would cost? How many people would it take to rig all that up? Does this sound logical to you? This "event" would be the single largest undertaking of planning and funding and execution; that has ever been done in the history of the world. And our government decided to just do this so we would look better declaring war? No. You wouldn't even do the most complicated thing you could possibly think of when you could just do nothing instead.
*Controlled demolitions*
Many people believe that we blew up our own towers with a couple thousand people in it so we could go drain the Middle East of it's oil. I'm not sure if you've ever seen a controlled demolition before but they don't start at the top and go down. On buildings that are mostly vertical it always starts from the bottom and goes up. That's not what we see in the videos. People claim that the "puffs of smoke" coming out of the windows are the explosions going off. No. The collapsing building is creating a huge amount of energy and that energy goes towards the easiest area of escape it can: the windows.
*Jet beams can't melt steel fuel*
This has been a major talking point among wacko conspiracy nuts for years. They get on the internet and read an article from Wikipedia that lists the melting point of steel as: 2500 degrees F and then look up the temperatures during the fires in the towers as: 800-1500 degrees f. OMG false flag!!!!!!!
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams!!!!!! Yes that is actually true. I wonder though, how hot does it have to be in order to cause steel to lose load-bearing strength? Around 1100 degrees f. If you think that because the steel wasn't turned into liquid that there is no way the buildings could have failed; I have some ocean-front property in Arizona I'd like to sell you. Another part of this is that people point to the fact that a lot of steel was recovered from ground zero that had obviously been melted. So how could that have happened without "help?" i.e. thermite. If you google pictures of the recovered metal from the site you might notice a lot of oxidation present. That means rust, dumbass. To get a bit sciency here there was a lot of iron recovered from ground zero as well. Not only all this but the metal was still very hot and was being hosed down constantly. There is something called an "exothermic reaction" which happens with hot iron exposed to O2. On top of that the water from the fire hoses would increase that temperature because the water would turn into hydrogen which would then turn back into water through steam and add even more fuel to the fire. This is most likely what cause the temperatures to get high enough to melt steel.
*WTC-7*
People are also claiming that building 7 was brought down with controlled demolition as well. Yeahhhh, no. Building 7 was under bombardment from debris falling from the two towers and also had a fire going inside for hours. It was constructed in such a way that there were two major support columns that each took 50% of the weight of the building. If one of those had been damaged then the other would have to take most of the weight of the building. There were cracks and scars in the sides of the building showing that the interior support was breaking down. This combined with the fire (which wasn't being contained at all) was the reason why WTC-7 collapsed.
Look people, these aren't hard concepts to grasp. You don't need a degree to understand them. Just use logic. I realize that for a lot of liberals, the idea of logic is a strange and scary thing to consider. It's ok though. You'll like thinking this way much better. Also it will help you with many other things in life such as: not pushing bullshit claims about conservatives, not blindly believing everything you hear about conservatives or Trump, not calling every white person who isn't you a white-supremacist, less virtue signaling, being less of a hypocrite and probably liking soy less. Those of us who think logically will welcome you with open arms or at the very least make fun of you a bit less. Thanks for letting me waste your time and/or insult you. Cheers.