Our once most popular Royal, Harry has become a pitiable figure consumed by anger
Gone spare
WHO cannot empathise with Prince Harry’s many mistakes?
Or the trauma of losing his beloved mother in such appalling circumstances — and having to remain stoic for a watching world aged just 12?
Yet neither can justify the destructive, vengeful path he has chosen, throwing his own family under a bus for millions of dollars.
His one-sided new attacks on William and Kate are especially cruel, as he knows they won’t hit back.
Harry is no longer that child from 1997.
He is a father of two, pushing 40, yet still behaving like a teenager . . . unwilling to accept he could be to blame for anything that’s gone wrong.
Even the shameful Nazi outfit The Sun exposed in 2005 is somehow now his brother and Kate’s fault.
William, who supported Harry for years through their shared heartbreak, is cast as the “arch-nemesis” who assaulted him while insulting his wife.
Harry may be surprised where public sympathy lies there.
Charles and William will be furious — but sad too, as millions are.
Our once most popular Royal, Harry has become a pitiable figure consumed by anger.
The narrative he has constructed — that he and his wife are victims of an oppressive institution and a supine media — is a fiction so flaky it even confuses him.
Hence the countless discrepancies in his story.
Friends are begging Harry to stop for his own good.
He should listen.
We fear, sadly, he’s already gone too far.
Strike back
WHAT a surprise.
Unions hell-bent on crippling our essential services claim anti-strike laws won’t work — and Labour vows to repeal them if they win power.
We know whose side they are on. Not the public’s.
Do the militants who cause mayhem, threatening jobs and businesses hoping to collapse the Government, really expect Downing Street to take it on the chin?
They have over-reached and the public knows it.
If No10 needs a new law to keep Britain running despite politically driven walkouts, bring it on.
Shifty Keir
IF we thought Keir Starmer had genuinely bought into leaving the EU we might welcome his Brexity “Take Back Control” Bill.
But, as so often, Labour’s leader looks like he is merely shifting his position to whatever is most convenient.
He says he always thought Leavers had a point.
But the reality is that Starmer thought so little of them that he ran the three-year campaign to annul their vote, via a second referendum skewed for Remain.
His proposed “Control” Bill sets a new high bar for brass neck.