Grant Shapps claims ‘the world has moved on from Boris Johnson’

Energy Security Secretary Grant Shapps has said the world is moving on from Boris Johnson after the former PM resigned last week.

Johnson resigned on Friday and was quickly followed by Nadine Dorries and Nigel Adams, leaving three seats up for grabs, and Rishi facing three by-elections.

Speaking on Sophy Ridge On Sunday, Mr Shapps he also said he did not agree with Johnson’s assessment that the Commons Privileges Committee’s partygate probe was a ‘witch hunt’ and an attempt to reverse Brexit.

The Cabinet minister, asked about the former prime minister’s comments said: ‘I definitely don’t feel that way.’

He added: ‘I think far from wanting to undo (Brexit), I think we’re in a phase now of using the many benefits of having that extra flexibility.

‘So, no, I don’t think that is the case.’

Mr Shapps said he had not seen the Privileges Committee report, so did not know what Boris Johnson was ‘getting at’ with his complaints of a ‘kangaroo court’.

He said: ‘I’m simply saying I haven’t seen that report, only Boris has seen it.

‘So, I don’t quite know what he is getting at when he says that. I haven’t seen the report, I haven’t seen the evidence they have presented.

‘What I do believe is that it is very important to elect committees, let them get on with their work.

‘I think the point of a member being sent details in advance, as has happened with Boris, is it gives someone the opportunity to comment on it and say, ‘No, this is an inaccuracy’ or what have you, and challenge it before it is published.

‘Do I think that the process is proper? Well, that is a decision for Parliament and not the Government, but Parliament and MPs decide themselves, and this is the process that MPs have collectively decided should be in place in situations like this.’

Asked whether he agreed with Sir Jake Berry’s comments suggesting the ‘establishment’ was in charge rather than voters, said: ‘No, actually in the end Boris was perfectly entitled to remain as an MP.

‘He has decided to step down and a couple of my other colleagues, all of them whom I’ve worked with and Boris in particular, I liked working with him as prime minister.

‘But … the world has moved on. He is the one who has removed himself from the current political scene, standing down as a member of Parliament.

‘We’ve got excellent leadership in place in No 10 with Rishi Sunak.’

Shapps comments come after Rishi Sunak has been urged to call a snap general election after three quick-fire MP resignations.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said Mr Sunak ‘must finally find a backbone’ and send the country to the polls after the Prime Minister found himself three MPs down in the space of 24 hours.

The call was echoed by Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey as rival parties hope to inflict more damaging by-election defeats on the Tories.

Nigel Adams on Saturday became the latest to announce he would be quitting as an MP with ‘immediate effect’.

An ally of Boris Johnson, he followed the former prime minister and former culture secretary Nadine Dorries in departing the green benches.

Mr Adams and Ms Dorries had been tipped for peerages in Mr Johnson’s resignation honours but neither featured in the published list.

The three resignations were an attempt to damage Mr Sunak after a bitter falling-out between Boris and Rishi that followed secret talks between the pair eight days ago, it has been reported.

Two further allies of Mr Johnson were claimed to be on ‘resignation watch’, including a 2019-intake MP.

A source close to Mr Johnson told the Telegraph some of Mr Sunak’s allies: ‘They think they can destroy Boris, which is obviously something that has never been achieved. His bounce-back ability is legendary.’ 

The source also claimed that Mr Sunak and his team conducted ‘a swindle … a dishonourable sleight of hand’ by publishing a list of new peers that omitted some of the former prime minister’s key allies and donors.

No 10 says that Mr Sunak simply adopted the names ‘approved’ by the House of Lords Appointments Commission.

Mr Johnson’s allies insist the Prime Minister should have offered his predecessor a public show of support during the House of Commons privileges committee investigation into whether he misled Parliament over rule-breaking in Downing Street during the Covid crisis.

Mr Johnson announced his exit on Friday as he directed a scathing attack on the Commons Privileges Committee probe.

He compared the process, chaired by veteran Labour MP Harriet Harman but which has a Conservative majority, to a ‘kangaroo court’ and accused the seven-person panel of being on a ‘witch hunt’.

In his lengthy statement, Mr Johnson appeared to keep the door open for a return to Parliament, saying he was leaving ‘for now’.

Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, a Johnson acolyte who was knighted in his resignation honours, said the former Tory leader could ‘easily get back into Parliament at the next election’, a suggestion which could mean Mr Johnson may be back in Westminster next year.

In an article for the Mail On Sunday, the former business secretary warned of a potential schism if the party machinery attempts to ‘block’ his return.

‘I would most strongly warn Conservative Party managers against any attempt to block Boris if he seeks the party nomination in another seat,’ he said.

‘Any attempt to do so would shatter our fragile party unity and plunge the Conservatives into civil war.’

Mr Johnson’s decision to step down came ahead of the publication of the Privileges Committee report into whether he lied to the Commons when he said No 10 had followed social distancing rules during the pandemic.

The committee’s findings have yet to be released but Mr Johnson’s response appears to confirm that the MPs have concluded he was not truthful about the boozy parties.

According to The Sunday Times, Mr Johnson was told by Ms Harman that his punishment would be a suspension from the Commons for a time that would ‘significantly exceed’ 10 days, thereby reaching the threshold for a by-election to possibly be triggered.

While Mr Johnson won his Uxbridge and South Ruislip seat with a 7,000 majority in 2019, early polling has suggested Labour could snatch it from the Tories in the upcoming by-election following his exit.

The Liberal Democrats have briefed that they could potentially pull off an upset in Ms Dorries’ former Mid Bedfordshire constituency despite a Tory majority of 24,000.

The Tories enjoy a comfortable 20,000 vote cushion against Labour in Mr Adams’ former Selby and Ainsty constituency in North Yorkshire.

But the governing party’s record has been poor in recent years, with the Tories losing four seats in by-elections since June 2021, three of them to the Lib Dems and a fourth to Labour.

The timing of the fresh contests in the three vacant constituencies has not yet been announced.

It is understood that chief whip Simon Hart could feasibly move a motion know as a ‘writ’ next week in at least one of the seats, giving between 21 and 27 working days for a vote to be held.

Meanwhile, Labour’s Sir Keir, in an article for the Sunday Mirror, accused the Prime Minister of accepting a resignation honours list from Mr Johnson that he said had seen Mr Sunak ‘agree to hand gongs to a cast list of cronies’.

It comes as No 10 confirmed that a meeting between Mr Sunak and Mr Johnson took place on June 2, where the subject of his pending honours roll was mentioned.

Several reports have suggested that Mr Johnson’s allies blame Downing Street for Tory MPs, including Ms Dorries, Mr Adams and Cop26 president Sir Alok Sharma, not appearing on the published peerages list on Friday despite them being nominated for the upper chamber.

Downing Street has denied any involvement by Mr Sunak in the process, other than to accept the House of Lords Appointments Committee’s (Holac) approved list.

Holac has, according to the Institute for Government think tank, confirmed that it rejected eight peerage nominees put forward by Mr Johnson on the grounds of propriety.

There has been suggestion that Holac would not approve peerages for MPs unless they were due to stand down immediately or were prepared to do so within six months.

A source close to Mr Sunak said: ‘When the Prime Minister met with the former prime minister recently, the former prime minister raised the matter of peerages with him, to which the current Prime Minister made clear he would follow precedent and not interfere with the process.

‘Any suggestions of promises made or guarantees given are categorically untrue.’

A source familiar with the conversation said that, when Mr Johnson noted that his nominations could trigger by-election contests, Mr Sunak replied with words to the effect of ‘so be it’.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.