Bride’s mum ‘would have been highly visible’ before fatal crash near wedding venue
The mother of a bride-to-be who was hit by a car and killed ‘would have been highly visible’ to the driver, an expert has said.
Judith Wadsworth, 66, was crossing an access road outside the Coniston Hotel and Spa, near Skipton, North Yorkshire, when she was hit by a Range Rover being driven by the hotel’s owner Nicholas Bannister.
The incident happened on February 7, 2020, as Judith had arrived at the hotel the day before her daughter’s wedding, which was due to take place there.
Bannister had driven a short distance from the front of the hotel, and is estimated to have been travelling between 9-12mph at the time.
He’s now on trial accused of causing death by driving without due care and attention, which he denies.
Ergonomics expert Dr David Usher told the jury at Bradford crown court that he had examined all the evidence to assess the ‘conspicuity’ of both Judith to Bannister, and the Range Rover to Judith.
He said: ‘In my opinion she would have been highly visible throughout Mr Bannister’s approach to the crossing, had he been looking at her.’
Dr Usher was asked about the influence of the A-pillar of the Range Rover.
He said it is ‘not credible’ that the structure could have obscured Bannister’s view of Mrs Wadsworth throughout the time she was walking from the car park to the point of impact.
He said: ‘She would have to had to run very fast, so I believe that is not credible.’
Dr Usher accepted an A-pillar can obscure a driver’s view momentarily, but said the relative positions of the post and the pedestrian are moving.
He also stressed it is a ‘natural part of driving’ for a motorist to move their head to compensate for this problem.
Dr Usher added Bannister’s familiarity with the location of the crossing was another factor increasing the conspicuity of Mrs Wadsworth.
Lisa Judge, defending, asked Dr Usher if it is possible that Mrs Wadsworth was distracted as she walked between the car park and the hotel, making the final preparations for her daughter’s wedding.
The expert told the jury: ‘We have no evidence to suggest that she was.’
Ms Judge said: ‘We have no evidence to suggest that she wasn’t.’
Dr Usher said ‘the likelihood was that she wasn’t’ but agreed with the barrister that it was possible.
The trial continues.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.