Biden handed huge loss in 1st Amendment fight

A federal appeals court has agreed with a lower court that the Biden administration likely can be proven to have pressured Big Tech to censor Americans whose views did not align with the Democrat talking points.

And the result is that leftists en masse are trying to deny it, a sentiment expressed by the White House, which stated, "This administration has promoted responsible actions to protect public health, safety, and security when confronted by challenges like a deadly pandemic and foreign attacks on our elections. Our consistent view remains that social media platforms have a critical responsibility to take account of the effects their platforms are having on the American people, but make independent choices about the information they present."

A commentary from Tyler O'Neil at The Daily Signal explained that Biden was "CAUGHT RED-HANDED" by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

He explained Biden and his officials are" scrambling to deny the obvious truth that they pressured Big Tech to censor Americans. They have the gall to hide behind Big Tech companies and blame them for the censorship, as though the Biden administration didn’t pressure them into clamping down on free speech in the first place."

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND's Email News Alerts!

It was a three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit that has blocked the government from using Big Tech to silence Americans, upholding the temporary injunction issued by U.S. District Court Judge Jerry Doughty.

The violations were of the most serious type. On "Washington Watch with Tony Perkins," the host explained, "I mean, this was damaging to the country. People were censored. People lost their jobs. There was so much that happened."

The case was initiated by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey and Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry.

Bailey explained, "this is all about protecting our constitutional right to free speech. The rights codified in the Bill of Rights come from God, not man. The purpose of the Constitution is to protect us from the government … [and] the First Amendment right to free speech is to invite … a marketplace of free ideas where we can disagree with the government."

He explained there are 20,000 pages of documents and "numerous depositions" explaining just how the White House demanded that social media corporations censor certain points of view during COVID.

The government appealed Doughty's injunction, and the Fifth Circuit wrote that the magnitude of the censorship enterprise conducted by the White House was worse than the "1798 Alien and Sedition Act, which President John Adams instituted to, as Bailey emphasized, 'jail and imprison anyone who opposed his foreign policy,'" the commentary explained.

The case has been described as addressing the worst First Amendment violations in American history.

Plaintiffs also include doctors who spoke out against COVID-19 mandates, such as Martin Kulldorff, Jayanta Bhattacharya, and Aaron Kheriaty; Gateway Pundit founder Jim Hoft; and Jill Hines, an anti-lockdown activist and co-director of Health Freedom Louisiana.

They charge that Biden "suppressed conservative-leaning free speech" on the scandal involving Hunter Biden's scandal-filled abandoned laptop, COVID-19, lockdowns, election integrity, the economy and Joe Biden himself.

The panel ruling means the judges believe the plaintiffs are likely to succeed in ultimately proving their case and that ongoing federal government pressure on social media companies represents a threat of harm against them.

The injunction bars some federal officials from meeting with social media companies for the purpose of pressuring them to attack free speech.

Named are Department of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the FBI, and the Justice Department, along with HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, and Biden.

The judges said, "The plaintiffs allege that federal officials ran afoul of the First Amendment by coercing and significantly pressuring 'social-media platforms to censor disfavored [speech],' including by 'threats of adverse government action' like antitrust enforcement and legal reforms. We agree."

The appeals court listed the actions by the president, his surgeon general, press secretary and others took "to pressure Big Tech to censor disfavored views."

According to a report from BizPacReview, the 5th Circuit gave Biden 10 days to appeal to the Supreme Court.

The unanimous court opinion did remove some federal agencies from the injunction restrictions.

The Washington Stand explained how the damage from Biden's agenda is continuing.

"The harm wasn’t frozen in time. … The harm is ongoing. … There’s a chilling effect on speech where now people are self-censoring."

He said, "It’s not just the [speakers] whose voices were silenced, [but also the listeners who] could have used that information to make individualized decisions, that were harmed."

IMPORTANT NOTE TO WND READERS: Believe it or not, today's high priests of climate-change apocalypse are correct in predicting that in just a few short years, the earth will become miserable, wretched and almost uninhabitable by human beings. But the grim future they envision won't come about because of "catastrophic climate change," but rather, because of the implementation of their completely insane and truly catastrophic agenda.

As Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore recently admitted, "If they actually achieve Net Zero, at least 50% of the population would die of hunger and disease." Likewise, writes energy expert and author Alex Epstein: "Today's proposed policies to rapidly eliminate fossil fuel use would, if fully implemented, have truly apocalyptic consequences – making the world an impoverished, dangerous, and miserable place for most people."

Question: When the scientific case for global warming apocalypse consists primarily of a 1-degree Celsius rise in temperature over more than 130 years, what explains the obsession with an imminent, climate-caused end of the world?

Although many groups have been drawn into the Climate Change Cult – from the news media (which has warned of climate catastrophe, either global warming or a "new ice age," for over a century!), to innocent school kids indoctrinated by hysterical leftist teachers, to liberal Democrats who claim "climate change" will destroy the earth in a few years – the REAL villains are the national and global elites who KNOW the apocalyptic global warming religion is just a cruel hoax, but promote and exploit it as a means of accomplishing their ultimate goal: Transforming and ruling the world.

The heart and soul of today's bizarre, pagan climate-change religion, and the global elites' strategies for using it to rule all of mankind, is powerfully exposed and illuminated in the September issue of WND's critically acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine, an issue titled "CULT OF THE CLIMATE APOCALYPSE: The elites' breathtaking strategy for ruling the world." WHISTLEBLOWER is available in both the popular print edition and a state-of-the-art digital version, either single issues or discounted annual subscriptions.

For 25 years, WND has boldly brought you the news that really matters. If you appreciate our Christian journalists and their uniquely truthful reporting and analysis, please help us by becoming a WND Insider!

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@wndnewscenter.org.

SUPPORT TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM. MAKE A DONATION TO THE NONPROFIT WND NEWS CENTER. THANK YOU!

The post Biden handed huge loss in 1st Amendment fight appeared first on WND.