Gaza War Leaves West Hesitant to Crack Down on Iran Nuclear Program
Worries of a wider regional conflict have sharpened since Hamas' October 7 attack and Israel's retaliatory bombardment and ground offensive aimed at destroying the Palestinian militants in Gaza.
At this week's Board of Governors meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna, the United States and the so-called E3 group — France, Germany and the United Kingdom — condemned Tehran's lack of cooperation.
Despite saying that Iran's actions had "pushed unprecedented boundaries," they held off on submitting a binding resolution.
"The picture is pretty bleak, but the fact at the moment is that there is no appetite to provoke a reaction in Iran in the context of the war in the Middle East," a senior diplomat said in summing up the current deadlock.
Israel says Hamas broke through Gaza's militarized border to kill about 1,200 people and seize around 240 Israeli and foreign hostages.
Retaliatory strikes and a ground offensive by Israel have killed about 15,000 people, the Hamas government in Gaza said.
'Very serious blow'
The 2015 deal curbing Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief started to unravel in 2018 when then-U.S. President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew from it and reimposed sanctions.
Iran retaliated by stepping up its nuclear activities.
Efforts to revive the deal have been fruitless so far with European-led talks on hold since 2022.
Last week's confidential IAEA report showed that Iran now has enough uranium enriched up to 60% — just short of weapons grade — to theoretically manufacture three bombs.
"That's quite an amount, especially if you don't use it for anything," said a diplomatic source.
Iran has repeatedly denied seeking nuclear weapons.
While Iran has been dragging its feet on reinstalling IAEA monitoring equipment it disconnected last year, it also recently withdrew the accreditation of several agency inspectors.
According to diplomats, eight inspectors from France and Germany have been affected by Tehran's decision.
Earlier this year, another IAEA inspector — a Russian — had been barred following the detection of a technical modification in centrifuges that had caused enrichment to peak at 84%.
Iran's barring of experienced agency inspectors has dealt a "very serious blow" to the IAEA's ability to monitor Tehran's nuclear program, IAEA head Rafael Grossi said Wednesday.
'Wrong signal'
Kelsey Davenport of the Arms Control Association think tank said that while the reluctance of the IAEA Board of Governors to act is "understandable," it also constituted "a case of geopolitics trumping nonproliferation norms."
Viewing Iran "in a vacuum" and failing to hold it accountable over its advancing nuclear program "sends the wrong signal to Tehran and other would-be proliferators," she cautioned.
Amid heightened tensions in the Middle East and Iran "on the threshold of nuclear weapons, there is an increasing risk that the United States or Israel will miscalculate Iranian nuclear intentions," she told AFP, calling on the Biden administration to break the deadlock.
In an effort to avoid stoking tensions in the region, the Western powers' reluctance to rebuke Iran has, however, "emboldened" Tehran, as it benefits from Moscow's "protection," said the senior diplomat.
The international community especially fears an extension of the Israel-Hamas war to the border between Lebanon and Israel, which has seen escalating exchanges of fire, primarily involving Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah, along with Palestinian groups.
"Given that we don't know how closely Tehran is linked to these groups," Western leaders take "as many precautions as possible," said Heloise Fayet, a researcher at the French Institute of International Relations.