Добавить новость
smi24.net
News in English
Март
2024

Justice Department Wants To Take Its Bite Out Of Apple

0

Over the course of the last few years, it feels like the FTC & DOJ have slowly started getting better at figuring out how to craft a better antitrust lawsuit. The earliest attempts were often beyond silly, but the more recent cases (while far from perfect) have finally started alleging things that seem like potential actual anticompetitive behavior.

The problem, to me, though, is that nearly every one of them overreaches, such that even when they allege things that seem potentially anti-competitive, they burden down the complaint with nonsense. But still, it feels like at least some of the early failures are leading to at least some more careful pleading in more recent cases. Not everyone agrees, though. An analysis by Daniel Crane, based on surveying various antitrust experts, seems to suggest that some of the more recent antitrust cases are on shaky ground (though it sounds like many of the experts think all the big tech antitrust cases are poorly argued).

As you’ve likely heard, the latest is last week’s move by the Justice Department and a bunch of states to sue Apple for a variety of antitrust violations. Depending on who you talk to, the case is “even stronger than imagined” or it’s patently “absurd.”

After spending a few days reading and rereading the complaint, talking to various experts, and thinking about it, I come down somewhere in the middle. There are parts of the complaint that do seem pretty ridiculous. And there are parts that at least raise legitimate concerns. But, even those legitimate concerns may still fail due to the market definition which, in this case, seems… aggressive?

The complaint itself is surprisingly readable for an antitrust complaint. That’s often a sign of a weakness in the underlying antitrust case. The more readable antitrust complaints frequently seem designed to sway the public by telling a good narrative, rather than getting to the heart of the legal issues in court.

The key part that makes this case stronger than others is that it actually shows the real potential for consumer harm, rather than relying on some of these newfangled competition theories that you don’t need to show consumer harm for an antitrust case.

But, still, some of the claims seem overblown. The DOJ’s lead argument is that the lack of super apps seems proof of Apple suppressing competition:

Super apps provide a user with broad functionality in a single app. Super apps can improve smartphone competition by providing a consistent user experience that can be ported across devices. Suppressing super apps harms all smartphone users—including Apple users—by denying them access to high quality experiences and it harms developers by preventing them from innovating and selling products.

The argument here is basically that if so-called “super apps” were allowed, users would let those apps mostly take over everything important on a phone. This would make the hardware layer less important, making it easier to switch from an iPhone to any other phone.

But… what a weird argument. The only major “super app” is WeChat in China. And there really are no super apps in the US. I guarantee that if there was a super app… the DOJ would likely be suing it for anticompetitive behavior. The fact that we don’t have super apps in the US seems like a sign of more healthy competition in the app market, and not proof of anti-competitive behavior by Apple.

It is true that the DOJ has emails from Apple execs fearing the rise of potential super apps, but this still doesn’t make much sense in the context of the larger complaint:

Apple recognizes that super apps with mini programs would threaten its monopoly. As one Apple manager put it, allowing super apps to become “the main gateway where people play games, book a car, make payments, etc.” would “let the barbarians in at the gate.” Why? Because when a super app offers popular mini programs, “iOS stickiness goes down.”

The lack of an anti-competitive app at the app level doesn’t seem like a particularly strong argument for anti-competitive behavior at the hardware/OS level.

The second concern also seems weak, at best. It’s the lack of success of cloud streaming games on iOS devices:

Cloud streaming game apps provide users with a way to play computing intensive games in the cloud. Cloud streaming games (and cloud streaming in general) can improve smartphone competition by decreasing the importance of expensive hardware for accomplishing high compute tasks on a smartphone. Suppressing cloud streaming games harms users by denying them the ability to play high-compute games, and it harms developers by preventing them from selling such games to users.

Once again, this all seems very speculative. People have been predicting big things for cloud gaming for many, many years now, and it’s never really caught on anywhere. And it’s not just because Apple doesn’t like them. Remember, Google had a whole big cloud gaming initiative that fizzled. It’s hard to blame that on Apple’s iOS policies.

From there, though, we get to a few arguments that should at least raise some eyebrows. Some of the decisions seem to have little purpose other than to limit competition and harm end users. I’ve gotten sick of antitrust cases trying to take things that have perfectly legitimate reasons for being done and casting them as being done for anti-competitive reasons, but here there are a few decisions that seem hard to justify by Apple (of course, we still need to hear Apple’s side of the story).

The strongest of these is how Apple has deliberately degraded messaging services. We’ve discussed this somewhat in the context of Apple and Beeper, where Beeper offered a third-party service that would make anyone’s messaging more secure by end-to-end encrypting messages between iMessage users and non-iMessage users. Apple blocked Beeper from doing so, claiming it was necessary for security purposes. But that made little sense.

And here, the DOJ calls out Apple’s behavior:

Messaging apps are apps that allow users to communicate with friends, family, and other contacts. Messaging apps that work equally well across all smartphones can improve competition among smartphones by allowing users to switch phones without changing the way they communicate with friends, family, and others. Apple makes third-party messaging apps on the iPhone worse generally and relative to Apple Messages, Apple’s own messaging app, by prohibiting third-party apps from sending or receiving carrier-based messages. By doing so, Apple is knowingly and deliberately degrading quality, privacy, and security for its users and others who do not have iPhones. Apple also harms developers by artificially constraining the size of their user base.

It seems likely that Apple will claim it does this for security reasons, but those reasons seem flimsy. There are many ways in which Apple could make sure that third-party messaging is more secure, but it chooses not to do so.

Again, here, the DOJ has pretty clear evidence that Apple is making that experience worse at least in part to build lock-in and to avoid competitive pressure.

Apple recognizes that its conduct harms users and makes it more difficult to switch smartphones. For example, in 2013, Apple’s Senior Vice President of Software Engineering explained that supporting cross-platform OTT messaging in Apple Messages “would simply serve to remove [an] obstacle to iPhone families giving their kids Android phones.” In March 2016, Apple’s Senior Vice President of Worldwide Marketing forwarded an email to CEO Tim Cook making the same point: “moving iMessage to Android will hurt us more than help us.”

In 2022, Apple’s CEO Tim Cook was asked whether Apple would fix iPhone-toAndroid messaging. “It’s tough,” the questioner implored Mr. Cook, “not to make it personal but I can’t send my mom certain videos.” Mr. Cook’s response? “Buy your mom an iPhone.”

While many will claim Cook was joking with that last quip, there is a valid point here. The reasons Apple made this decision appear to be not for the benefit of users, but for anti-competitive reasons.

The last two areas are a bit more middle-ground: smartwatches and digital wallets. I don’t think that Apple should need to go out of its way to allow third parties to build tools, but the DOJ again suggests that Apple has deliberately, for anti-competitive reasons, sought to limit access to important functionality. On the smartwatch front, Apple has limited access to certain functionality that the Apple Watch gets access to to guarantee that third party smartwatches can’t compete:

Smartwatches are an expensive accessory that typically must be paired to a smartphone. Smartwatches that can be paired with different smartphones allow users to retain their investment in a smartwatch when switching phones thereby decreasing the literal cost associated with switching from one smartphone to another, among other things. By suppressing key functions of third-party smartwatches—including the ability to respond to notifications and messages and to maintain consistent connections with the iPhone—Apple has denied users access to high performing smartwatches with preferred styling, better user interfaces and services, or better batteries, and it has harmed smartwatch developers by decreasing their ability to innovate and sell products.

And, with digital wallets becoming a key payment system, Apple also appears to be limiting third parties from doing much that is useful:

Digital wallets are an increasingly important way that smartphones are used and are a product in which users develop a great deal of comfort and trust as they typically contain users’ most sensitive information. Digital wallets that work across smartphone platforms allow users to move from one smartphone brand to another with decreased frictions, among other things. Apple has denied users access to digital wallets that would have provided a wide variety of enhanced features and denied digital wallet developers—often banks—the opportunity to provide advanced digital payments services to their own customers.

There may be a stronger “security” argument for that last one, but some of it sure looks like it’s only being done for anti-competitive purposes. For example, blocking anyone else from tapping into the NFC tap-to-pay feature:

Multiple app developers have sought direct NFC access for their payment or wallet apps. Yet Apple prohibits these developers from incorporating tap-to-pay functionality in their apps for fear that doing so would “be one way to disable [A]pple [P]ay trivially,” leading to the “proliferation of other payment apps” that might operate cross-platform and ultimately undermine Apple’s smartphone monopoly.

There is no technical limitation on providing NFC access to developers seeking to offer third-party wallets. For example, Apple allows merchants to use the iPhone’s NFC antenna to accept tap-to-pay payments from consumers. Apple also acknowledges it is technically feasible to enable an iPhone user to set another app (e.g., a bank’s app) as the default payment app, and Apple intends to allow this functionality in Europe.

So, in the end, this case strikes me as having some good parts and some questionable parts.

In every antitrust case, the big question is going to be about market definition. Because if Apple doesn’t have a dominant position in whatever market is accepted, then it’s pretty much free to do those anti-competitive things, and if people don’t like it, they should vote with their feet. The DOJ will claim, of course, that many of the decisions above were designed to block the ability to vote with their feet, and I’m sure Apple will insist that the market should be as widely construed as possible and… that could work? Perhaps they can convince a judge (or eventually a jury) that the iPhone isn’t necessarily as dominant as it might otherwise seem. In an era where we’re seeing more and more devices come on the market, some of which you could argue compete with smartphones in new and novel ways, perhaps the market is that broad.

All that is to say, we’ve seen some pretty ridiculous antitrust cases over the last few years. This one, though, seems more on the serious side of the ledger — but with some holes that Apple will look to push back on. Still, this case isn’t a slam dunk either way, and I think Apple has a real fight on its hands.








Хаски на Summer Sound – выиграй билеты на Like FM

Звезды тогда и сейчас: как выглядят самые красивые женщины Голливуда

Лео Канделаки и Анжелика Стубайло посетят Казань в новой трэвел-игре «Кто куда» на ТНТ

Любовь в сердце и в «Тропикана Парк»


Tourism is increasing over prepandemic levels, overwhelming popular destinations

The founder of Deliciously Ella started a blog when suffering from severe chronic pain. Now, her multimillion-dollar snack empire is going global

Why Juventus spent 111m this summer for only one new player

The Best Story Of Chicago Bulls’ Offseason Just Got A Happy Ending


В Челябинске арестован председатель правления банка "Снежинский"

В Московской области задержан томский предприниматель, укравший 8,5 млн рублей

В Курске потушили пожар в квартире на проспекте Дериглазова

Кайрат Бермуканов поддержал Петра Яна перед боем в Абу‑Даби


The dairy industry would like Gen Z to drink more milk, so they made a Fortnite diner tycoon game

Настройки GameHub и Winlator для игры в Prey (2017) на Android

Microsoft warns of 'active attacks' on its government and business server tech, with one cybersecurity expert claiming that they should 'assume that you have been compromised'

Bungie promises to fix Destiny 2's new metroid-style morph ball as it makes players sick and glitches out on ultrawide monitors



Молодежь Подмосковья приглашают принять участие в конкурсе к 295-летию русского полководца Александра Суворова

Мебель, которой доверяют профессионалы — в "Аверсе"

Кризис спроса: как выбрать надёжного застройщика в 2025 году

Акция «Каникулы с Росгвардией» продолжается в Чеченской Республике


Молодежь Подмосковья приглашают принять участие в конкурсе к 295-летию русского полководца Александра Суворова

Нам есть чем гордиться: каким будет Национальный центр «Россия» на Краснопресненской набережной

Движение к победе: в России стартует премия «Мы верим твердо в героев спорта»

Пригородные поезда с выгодой: куда отправиться из Петербурга летом


Paul Oakenfold возвращается в Россию: легенда электронной музыки даст концерты в Москве и Петербурге спустя 7 лет

Акция «Каникулы с Росгвардией» продолжается в Чеченской Республике

Под Тамбовом пройдёт фестиваль авторской песни "Там, под Лысой Горой"

2 августа Россия поздравит своих десантников с их Днем уже в 95-й раз Не забывайте, Ильин день - это день десантника


Вероника Кудерметова оценила экстрим-парк «Урам» в Казани

Рублев прокомментировал вылет с турнира в Лос-Кабосе

Соболенко сохраняет первое место в чемпионской гонке WTA.

Новак Джокович проводит 900-ю неделю в топ-10 рейтинга ATP


Акция «Каникулы с Росгвардией» продолжается в Чеченской Республике

В Московской области задержан томский предприниматель, укравший 8,5 млн рублей

ИЖС: требуется системная настройка

Под Тамбовом пройдёт фестиваль авторской песни "Там, под Лысой Горой"


Музыкальные новости

Metallica спасла Tomorrowland: фестиваль в Бельгии состоится, несмотря на пожар на главной сцене

«Я злая, хотя, тоже женщина»: жена Басты затравила беременную блогершу

Флигель усадьбы Шаляпина внесли в реестр объектов культурного наследия столицы

Семейная Зарница 2025


Мебель, которой доверяют профессионалы — в "Аверсе"

Молодежь Подмосковья приглашают принять участие в конкурсе к 295-летию русского полководца Александра Суворова

В Московской области задержан томский предприниматель, укравший 8,5 млн рублей

Paul Oakenfold возвращается в Россию: легенда электронной музыки даст концерты в Москве и Петербурге спустя 7 лет


VK Fest 2025 побил рекорд по числу артистов и вошёл в Книгу рекордов России

У России отняли исторический рекорд в фигурном катании и отдали его Америке перед Олимпиадой 2026 года в Италии

«Компромиссная цифра»: на сколько ЦБ РФ может снизить ключевую ставку 25 июля

Лео Канделаки и Анжелика Стубайло посетят Казань в новой трэвел-игре «Кто куда» на ТНТ


Сильный ливень заблокировал людей в авто в центре Москвы

Движение на участке Филевской линии метро остановили из-за ливней

Москвичей предупредили о задержках наземного транспорта из-за ливня

Столичные росгвардейцы оказали помощь мотоциклистке, пострадавшей в ДТП


Путин отметил успехи российских школьников на математической олимпиаде.

Министр юстиции поделился информацией о роли адвокатов в специальной военной операции.

Путин выразил соболезнования семье председателя Верховного суда Подносовой

В Москве скончалась подруга Путина, которая рассказывала о его молодости: «Нам он как мужчина не нравился»




Трихолог Мадина Осман: типы алопеции и методы борьбы с ними

По России распространяется новый вариант коронавируса

Собянин: создание 5 центров женского здоровья завершат в этом году

После вспышки инфекции на теплоходе «Леонид Красин» начали расследование


Axios: закон о НАБУ может спровоцировать Трампа на новую волну критики Киева

В центре Киева митингуют против реформ Зеленского


Движение к победе: в России стартует премия «Мы верим твердо в героев спорта»

Парк Юрия Лужкова 19 июля стал территорией мастеров экстремального спорта на фестивале The BOWL

Кайрат Бермуканов поддержал Петра Яна перед боем в Абу‑Даби

Росгвардия обеспечила безопасность финиша международного ралли «Шелковый путь»


Посланник Трампа рассказал, как «неформально» договаривался с Лукашенко: после нескольких тостов Минск освободил политзаключенных

Лукашенко призвал белорусских нефтяников «не раскачиваться, а бурить и бурить»


Более 800 спортивных площадок обновят и обустроят в Москве - Сергей Собянин

Более 800 спортивных площадок обновят и обустроят в Москве — Сергей Собянин

Собянин: Модернизация двух корпусов ГКБ имени Вересаева завершится в этом году

Собянин: вырубаем деревья до гнездования птиц и восстанавливаем природу при строительстве метро


Зарядки для электромобилей «Энергия Москвы» станут платными

Россияне рассказали, по каким критериям выбирают квартиру для покупки в 2025 году

Уже 59 орловчан решили побороться за просветительскую награду «Знание. Премия»

Фестиваль «Сады и цветы»: как Москву превращают в городской оазис


Paul Oakenfold возвращается в Россию: легенда электронной музыки даст концерты в Москве и Петербурге спустя 7 лет

Под Тамбовом пройдёт фестиваль авторской песни "Там, под Лысой Горой"

Парк Юрия Лужкова 19 июля стал площадкой фестиваля The BOWL

Молодежь Подмосковья приглашают принять участие в конкурсе к 295-летию русского полководца Александра Суворова


Центр подготовки личного состава Северо-Западного округа Росгвардии пополнили призывники

В Нарьян-Маре из-за холодов возобновили подачу отопления в дома

Республика Алтай вошла в десятку регионов России по развитию ипотеки

В Башкирии ревнивец ранил жену шампуром и сдался полиции


В Симферополе наградили юных крымчан за отвагу и решительность

Актуальная информация о задержке поездов в Крым и обратно

В Симферополе на базе «Клинического госпиталя для ветеранов войн» функционирует гериатрический центр для пожилых людей с возрастными нарушениями

Поезда в Крым и из Крыма следуют с задержками до пяти часов


В Московской области задержан томский предприниматель, укравший 8,5 млн рублей

Мария Шувалова. В столице Татарстана чествовали балетную диву за блистательную «Анюту»

Кризис спроса: как выбрать надёжного застройщика в 2025 году

Акция «Каникулы с Росгвардией» продолжается в Чеченской Республике














СМИ24.net — правдивые новости, непрерывно 24/7 на русском языке с ежеминутным обновлением *