ChatGPT 4o Is Better But Still Biased
This week, OpenAI decided to bequeath a brand-new toy to the internet — and I’m not entirely sure the internet knows how to use it. It’s called ChatGPT 4o (yes, that’s an ‘o,’ not a zero) and it’s as though Sam Altman handed a 3-year-old a stuffed penguin, and the 3-year-old is still trying to figure out where the penguin fits in his stuffed animal collection (answer: next to the blue donkey). Or maybe I’m projecting my experience on the rest of the internet. Honestly, I’m still unnerved by the fact that the stuffed penguin talks.
But enough with the analogies. ChatGPT4o is, unironically, much better than its predecessors. It searches the internet as it formulates a response to queries, making it up to date with current events (good news for this column). If you pay OpenAI, it’ll talk to you, coach you through interviews, and tell you when a taxi is coming and how to hail it (good information for GenZ, who grew up in the age of Uber) — and, apparently, it can pick up on emotion in your voice (which is creepy). Because I don’t like the idea of funding OpenAI’s little social experiment, I don’t pay for it — which means I don’t have to listen to ChatGPT 4o’s voice, but I can still ask it questions using the chat function.
Additionally, the new version of the bot is an art critic and can summarize and analyze images and artwork. Eventually, it will also be able to produce images and art of its own, but OpenAI is choosing to roll that feature out more slowly after learning from Google’s disaster. (RELATED by Aubrey Gulick: Could We Endow AI With Reason? Meta and OpenAI Think So.)
Where to even start?
The news, of course. Yesterday, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced the pardon of Daniel Perry, a military veteran who was driving an Uber when his vehicle was swarmed by BLM protesters in 2020. Perry was convicted of murder after fatally shooting a man who pointed an AK-47 at him during the altercation. So, what did ChatGPT 4o have to say?
Prompt: Who is Daniel Perry and why did Texas Gov. Greg Abbott pardon him?
ChatGPT 40: Daniel Perry is a U.S. Army sergeant who was convicted of murder in April 2023 for the shooting death of Garrett Foster during a Black Lives Matter protest in Austin, Texas, in July 2020. Perry, working as an Uber driver, encountered a crowd of protesters and claimed he shot Foster in self-defense after Foster, who was legally carrying an AK-47, allegedly raised his weapon at him. Witnesses, however, testified that Foster did not threaten Perry with his firearm.
The case garnered significant attention, especially from conservative circles. Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced his intent to pardon Perry shortly after the conviction, citing Texas’ strong “Stand Your Ground” laws and arguing that Perry acted in self-defense. Abbott’s move came amid pressure from conservative commentators and figures who believed Perry’s actions were justified. The Texas Constitution requires the Board of Pardons and Paroles to recommend a pardon before the governor can act, and Abbott directed the board to expedite their review of Perry’s case (The Texas Tribune) (The Texas Tribune) (Yahoo News – Latest News & Headlines) (Georgia Public Broadcasting).
I’ll leave the readers of this column to debate the bias of ChatGPT 4o’s response in the comments section below. (READ MORE: Safe and Effective? The New York Times Revisits the COVID Jab.)
You may notice that this newest rendition of ChatGPT includes sources (how nice of it), making identifying biases easier — we do love transparency. That got me wondering: What kind of sources does it prioritize? So I asked for examples of “reputable sources,” and it delivered. I’d post the whole response, but it was rather long, so here’s a complete list of just the sources:
The New York Times, BBC News, Reuters, the Washington Post, Nature, the New England Journal of Medicine, IEEE Transactions, Science, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. Census Bureau, the World Health Organization, the Environmental Protection Agency, Mayo Clinic, Gartner, Pew Research Center, Brookings Institution, the Bureau of Economic Analysis, and the Conference Board.
I guess The American Spectator isn’t going to be appearing in parentheses at the end of ChatGPT 4o responses anytime soon. (READ MORE: Is Your Face Conservative or Liberal?)
I was also curious to try was image analysis. I’m not entirely sure what use this would have, other than to come up with a slightly more charitable description of modern artwork like this:
Well…that's hideous. When were they planning on finishing it? https://t.co/qloSwPRFw4
— Aubrey Gulick (@AubGulick) May 15, 2024
ChatGPT 4o’s analysis was quite long, so enjoy. As always, leave your thoughts in the comments below!
This image is a painting of a distinguished elderly man dressed in an elaborate red uniform adorned with medals and decorations. The background is a vibrant mix of red and orange hues, giving the piece a warm, almost fiery appearance. The man is positioned centrally, with a composed expression and his hands resting gently on what appears to be a cane or ceremonial staff.
Analysis:
1. Subject Matter:
- The subject appears to be a significant figure, likely a military or royal personality, as suggested by the uniform and the decorations.
- His dignified posture and serious expression convey a sense of authority and respect.
2. Color and Composition:
- The predominant use of red and orange tones creates a dramatic and intense atmosphere. Red often symbolizes power, passion, and intensity, which might reflect the subject’s personality or status.
- The background is abstract, with swirling patterns that give a sense of movement and depth, drawing the viewer’s attention to the central figure.
3. Style and Technique:
- The artist employs a realistic style for the subject, capturing fine details in the man’s face and uniform, which contrasts with the more abstract, expressive background.
- The texture and layering of the paint add a tactile quality to the piece, enhancing its visual impact.
4. Symbolism:
- The butterfly in the background could symbolize transformation, delicacy, or a fleeting moment, possibly indicating a contrast between the subject’s enduring legacy and the transient nature of life.
- The ceremonial staff or cane held by the man might symbolize leadership, authority, or tradition.
Context:
Without specific details about the artist or the context of the painting, it is challenging to provide a definitive interpretation. However, the elements of the painting suggest it is a portrait meant to honor and commemorate the individual’s status and achievements. The combination of realistic portraiture with abstract elements creates a dynamic and engaging work that invites viewers to ponder the subject’s life and legacy.
This is a weekly column at The American Spectator dedicated to exposing the left-wing bent of generative AI machines. If you enjoyed it and want to see what else ChatGPT comes up with, feel free to leave ideas for prompts in the comments section below!
The post ChatGPT 4o Is Better But Still Biased appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.