Victim’s family seeks denial of parole for ex-LAPD detective who murdered romantic rival

LOS ANGELES — Family members of a woman who was shot to death inside her Van Nuys condominium in 1986 urged the state’s parole board Monday to revoke a decision recommending parole for a now-former Los Angeles Police Department detective who confessed at a parole hearing last year that she murdered her ex-lover’s new wife.

Sherri Rasmussen’s widower, John Ruetten, told the parole board during a hearing held in Sacramento on Monday that Stephanie Ilene Lazarus — whom he referred to as “the inmate” — “lied for decades until her only option was to pursue parole.”

Speaking to the board remotely, Ruetten said his slain wife’s parents lost a child and her sisters lost a dear friend and confidante “because Sherri loved and married me.”

“For me, this reality and pain never subside,” he said, his voice breaking. “I respectfully request you revoke her grant for parole.”

A state parole board panel recommended parole Nov. 16 for Lazarus, an art theft investigator and 25-year LAPD veteran who was convicted in March 2012 of first-degree murder for the Feb. 24, 1986, killing of Sherri Rasmussen.

Gov. Gavin Newsom subsequently asked the full parole board to review the parole grant for Lazarus, who is now 64 and serving a 27-year-to-life state prison sentence. The board is expected to issue a ruling Tuesday.

At a hearing last Nov. 16, Lazarus publicly admitted that she had killed the 29-year-old Glendale Adventist Medical Center nursing supervisor.

Rasmussen was shot three times in the Balboa Boulevard condominium she shared with her husband. Rasmussen had married Ruetten, Lazarus’ one-time love interest, three months before her death.

“It makes me sick to this day that I took an oath to protect and serve people, and I took Sherri Rasmussen’s life from her, a nurse,” Lazarus said, according to a transcript of the parole hearing last November. “All I could think about was getting out of there before the police showed up.”

She said she subsequently threw the gun into a bushy area off the freeway and reported her gun stolen to the Santa Monica Police Department, according to the transcript.

Lazarus did not appear before the parole board at its hearing Monday.

But a transcript from her parole hearing last November quotes her as saying, “I never got comfortable thinking I got away with this. … I didn’t do the right thing because I didn’t want to face the consequences of my actions. I didn’t want to go to prison.”

“… I will never, ever harm an individual like I did on February 24, 1986, when I murdered, callously murdered and heinously murdered Sherri Rasmussen,” the transcript quotes Lazarus as saying at the parole hearing.

Two of the victim’s sisters and two of her nieces joined Los Angeles police Det. Greg Stearns, former prosecutor Paul Nunez, two of the victim’s friends and an attorney representing the victim’s family Monday in opposing the parole grant.

The victim’s sister, Connie, said she didn’t believe that Lazarus met the intent of the state’s youthful offender statute under which she is now eligible for parole, saying that Lazarus had a college degree from UCLA and had undergone an extensive psychological examination at the police academy.

Stearns told the parole board that Lazarus “stalked” her victim, chose a time and place where she would be alone, shot her to death, staged a burglary and made a false report to explain the absence of her gun.

“Those are not the hallmarks of a youthful offender. Those are the hallmarks of criminal sophistication,” the detective said, urging the board to consider a letter sent by the Los Angeles Police Department “in opposition.”

Meanwhile, a number of Lazarus’ supporters, who have dealt with her since she’s been in prison, told the parole board that they believed she is remorseful and that her release on parole should go forward.

One called her a “healed and transformed person” who has “worked tirelessly to improve herself,” and another called her a “community builder” and cited her “warmth, friendliness and outgoing nature.”

A former state prison inmate said that Lazarus has been a “personal mentor” to her, saying that she enrolled in and graduated from college because of Lazarus, whom she said should be allowed to “reintegrate back into society.”

Lazarus retired from the LAPD after being arrested by Robbery-Homicide Division detectives at the department’s downtown headquarters, largely as a result of DNA evidence taken from a bite mark on Rasmussen’s left forearm.

LAPD detectives had trailed Lazarus to surreptitiously get a DNA sample from her in May 2009 by collecting a drink cup and straw she had thrown in a trash can outside a Costco store.

Rasmussen’s father, Nels, had insisted shortly after his daughter’s killing that police investigate Lazarus, who had been an officer for two years at the time of Rasmussen’s death. But the case went cold until 2004, when investigators with the LAPD’s Cold Case Unit reopened the case and asked the coroner’s office to locate the bite mark tissue sample, which had been stored in a freezer in an evidence room since 1986, according to a 2015 ruling by a three-justice panel from California’s 2nd District Court of Appeal that upheld Lazarus’ conviction.

DNA testing determined that the major profile was from a female, and investigators turned their attention toward specific women who might have had reason to harm Rasmussen, according to the ruling.

The appellate court panel noted in its ruling that Lazarus’ DNA profile “precisely matched the profile of the person who bit Rasmussen shortly before her death.”

Lazarus had a “compelling motive to kill Rasmussen” because she had been abruptly dropped by Ruetten when he met his future wife, and Lazarus had confronted Rasmussen at Glendale Adventist Medical Center, where the 29-year- old woman worked as a nursing supervisor, the justices noted in the 2015 ruling.

Ruetten and Rasmussen were married in November 1985, a few months after Lazarus wrote Ruetten’s mother that she was “truly in love with John,” the appellate court panel noted.

“The evidence of motive and the circumstantial evidence, combined with the presence of appellant’s DNA on a wound inflicted on the victim during her struggles with her assailant, provided convincing evidence of appellant’s guilt,” Associate Justice Nora Manella wrote on behalf of the panel in its 2015 ruling.

The California Supreme Court refused in October 2015 to review the case against Lazarus.

After the verdict, then-LAPD Chief Charlie Beck called the case “a tragedy on every level” and apologized for how long it took to “solve this case and bring a measure of justice to this tragedy.”