Are Narek Samsonyan and Vazgen Saghatelyan political prisoners? - International Center on Development of Parliamentarism
ArmInfo. A month has passed since the co-authors of the "Imnemimi" podcast, opposition public
figures Narek Samsonyan and Vazgen Saghatelyan were illegally detained. the International Center on Development of Parliamentarism reported on its Facebook account.
According to the source, the political motivation to deprive them of
their freedom is not denied even by the current authorities. So, on
March 22 of this year, Samsonyan and Saghatelyan were detained and
then arrested on charges of hooliganism. Moreover, the process of
detention itself was carried out with the use of force, degrading the
dignity and personal integrity of a person, with the use of extremely
unreasonable and disproportionate violence.
According to the criminal prosecution initiated, Samsonyan and
Saghatelyan are accused of committing a crime under Article 297 of
the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia (hooliganism), that is,
using information and communication technologies to show disrespect
for society or open disdain for legal or moral norms. "The same norms
that were demonstrated by humiliating a person and using obscene
language addressed to them," the message says.
The source added that it is obvious to an unbiased observer that the
editing of the mentioned crime is a primitive reproduction of the
well-known crime of "serious crime", added to the RA Criminal Code by
the ruling political force in July 2021 and then removed under
international pressure, the purpose of which is to arbitrarily punish
citizens who criticize the government.
"As a result of the mentioned simple legislative tricks, the ruling
political power, apparently, tried to circumvent the requirement
attributed to it by international structures regarding the
fundamental rights of freedom of speech and information, and on the
other hand, continue to punish oppositionists who criticize it with
the help of criminal legal instruments. Samsonyan's arrest and
Saghatelyan is obvious evidence of this goal. Moreover, this
interpretation of this crime is in direct contradiction with the case
law established by the European Court of Human Rights, according to
which the permissible limits of critical statements against officials
are much wider. In particular, in the Linges case. v. Austria" the
ECtHR stated that the limits of permissible/acceptable criticism are
wider than in the case of private individuals. These people
inevitably and deliberately expose themselves to increased attention
from journalists and the general public for their every statement and
action and are therefore obliged to show a higher degree of tolerance
. In the case of Gundem v. Turkey, the ECtHR stated that the
authorities of a democratic state must tolerate criticism, even if it
is provocative or offensive. In the case of Rodriguez v. Portugal,
the ECtHR noted that the permissible limits of criticism of a public
figure are wider than in the case of private individuals. In the case
"Dalban v. Romania," the ECHR found it admissible to accuse the
politician of corruption and misuse of public funds," the report
emphasizes.
Its authors recall that on October 3, 2012, the Parliamentary
Assembly of the Council of Europe adopted Resolution 1900, defining
the concept of "political prisoner." According to the resolution, a
person deprived of personal liberty is considered a political
prisoner if the detention was applied in violation of any of the
fundamental guarantees defined by the European Convention on Human
Rights and its protocols. In the case of Samsonyan, the method of
his detention, which humiliates his dignity and personal integrity,
confirms the presence of this criterion. Moreover, it is obvious that
if the detention of Saghatelyan had not been followed in
chronological order by the publication of a video recording of
Samsonyan's shameful imprisonment and its harsh criticism from human
rights activists. A political prisoner is also a person whose length
of detention is clearly disproportionate to the crime for which the
person was found guilty.
Samsonyan and Saghatelyan were detained by law enforcement officers
on March 22. Moreover, Samsonyan was detained with the use of brutal
disproportionate force, degrading human dignity. Later it became
known that Samsonyan was detained as part of a case being
investigated by the Investigative Committee under the article
"hooliganism committed by a group of persons using information
technology." As it turned out, the hosts of the "Imnemnim" podcast
were detained for voicing obscene language against Armenian Prime
Minister Nikol Pashinyan live. Both journalists are now under arrest.