O’Hara, now an analyst on NFL Network, ranked Allen over Patrick Mahomes among quarterbacks in the divisional dound. And even after Allen lost to Mahomes on Sunday for the third time in the playoffs, O’Hara wasn’t backing down from the take, saying he still believes Allen is the better quarterback while Mahomes has the better team around him.
“Those rankings right there, you could change them week to week if you want, but still, regardless of the outcome I’m taking Josh Allen every time,” O’Hara said. “I think Mahomes has the better team, but pure quarterback play, I think Josh Allen is [better].”
The rest of the set was incredulous, but O’Hara was steadfast in his take despite that.
Shaun O'Hara goes to astronomical lengths to explain on NFL Network why he would take Josh Allen over Patrick Mahomes in spite of Allen losing his third straight playoff game to Mahomes.
O’Hara also criticized Buffalo receiver Stefon Diggs, who couldn’t quite reel in what could have been a game-changing catch during Buffalo’s final drive.
“He threw a 70-yard bomb to Stefon Diggs who should’ve caught the ball,” O’Hara said. “You get paid to catch the ball.”
Fans seemed just as flabbergasted as O’Hara’s colleagues.
Why is it so hard to say Pat is the best QB in the NFL from the 1st day he started and everyone else is playing for 2nd place?? https://t.co/mIU2CJ1aib
The bills put handcuffs on Allen because he was so reckless with the ball and fired his OC because of the turnovers. He’s the new farve. Madden would fawn over dude even though he was a terrible decision maker. Now some folks in media are doing that with Allen. https://t.co/UcWcahE3KX
Настройки GameHub и Winlator для игры в Prey (2017) на Android
The dairy industry would like Gen Z to drink more milk, so they made a Fortnite diner tycoon game
Bungie promises to fix Destiny 2's new metroid-style morph ball as it makes players sick and glitches out on ultrawide monitors
Microsoft warns of 'active attacks' on its government and business server tech, with one cybersecurity expert claiming that they should 'assume that you have been compromised'
